|
• Re:
To me, logically, HAS seems to be a means of stating the reverse of a = b OF c, such that c HAS b = a or John has a wife which is Mary. It states Mary is the wife of John backwards. Otherwise, you'd have to have another variable (call it d) that represents "husband" so that the statement John is the husband of Mary becomes c = d OF a. In your case, I'd say HAS allows for the c = d OF a to be stated without the use of d, in the form of c HAS b = a. So using your HAS idea you have:
a = Mary
b = wife
c = John
HAS and OF are the logical operators used to relate them. Without HAS, you'd have:
d = husband
Thereby, allowing the same endpoint (c = a), but with different midpoints (b and d). Hope this makes logical sense.
The Intellector
|