|
• Re:
First, I'm not going to answer all questions in the questionnaire. However, I will hit on some.
Your "Fact" is not a wise starting point, and that is where the danger comes in. You do NOT want to make a machine more intelligent than a human, if and when it is possible. The first goal is to make a machine that exhibits intelligence equal to an animals (such as a cat or dog). Then, through careful study along the way, you'll want to get to human level intelligence. Once it has acheived that level, leave it there. A machine as intelligent as us can be dangerous enough in the wrong hands. And in such hands, if it did become a threat, it can't always outsmart us and we can gain the upperhand. However, if we created a machine that is more intelligent than us, we'll have a much harder time outsmarting it and stopping it if it falls into the wrong hands. Human level intelligence is not a simple system. It is very complex and tricky. If and when we achieve the ability to create such machines, very few should be created (maximum of 1 in my opinion) and they should be monitored and study constantly.
Machines can be creative and they can have emotions. Once scientists learn how our neural nets create emotions, they can be replicated by machines. At this point, it's all a matter of proper neural circuitry. We can already create decently accurate neuron models, therefore, all that's left is the circuitry to make them perform intelligent functions, including creativity and emotions.
However, even if circuitry is the major issue at this point, it still doesn't mean we're close to human level intelligence. We still don't even have a machine with the intelligence of a rat. The circuitry is perhaps more complex than the neurons themselves. Also, the glial cells (the other 90% of the brain) contributes to neural processing in a big way. Those cells are still being heavily researched. So, neurons are only a small part in the whole picture. Human intelligence may be reached in this century but probably not in this decade or perhaps even the next.
A lot of your other questions lead me back to my previous post's point: We control the AI, it does not control us. If it becomes a rampaging Terminator, its because we let it become that way. Even if it were possible for the AI to become "self-aware" on its own unexpectedly, unless we're stupid and let it control our military (like Skynet for instance) before it's fully tested, it can't harm us.
We are the creators of AI. It can't create itself. Therefore, we control it.
The Intellector
|